<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vergil Kanne &#187; dashes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vergilkanne.com/designtag/dashes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vergilkanne.com</link>
	<description>SEO addict, photographer, interactive developer, on-line marketing fanatic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Old SEO Debate Update</title>
		<link>http://www.vergilkanne.com/design07/old-seo-debate-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vergilkanne.com/design07/old-seo-debate-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vergilkanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google moderator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underscores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url structure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vergilkanne.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I don&#8217;t trust Matt Cutts to tell the truth to all questions, or more specifically relevant powerful questions, I do think it&#8217;s fairly safe to assume he&#8217;ll be honest on the more inane ones. So while some may say Cutts&#8217; comment regarding dashes vs. underscores was a few years old and therefore unreliable as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vergilkanne.com/design07/old-seo-debate-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Old SEO Debate &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.vergilkanne.com/design06/an-old-seo-debate-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vergilkanne.com/design06/an-old-seo-debate-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vergilkanne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashes vs underscores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underscores]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vergilkanne.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dashes win out. I have no doubt that search engines understand both, however the small test case clearly shows that keywords are more easily identified using a dash as the delimiter rather than an underscore. But was this test case actually even necessary. Just do a search for any keyword and examine the results for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vergilkanne.com/design06/an-old-seo-debate-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

